Old media vs New media
Thursday, April 13, 2006
This is classic. Earlier this week, I was brainstorming for ways to get more exposure for BMA. I decided to email the career columnists for certain newspapers in the Southeast, and pitch the idea to them of an article focusing on how bloggers are now using their blogs as a tool in their job search. I mentioned that an employer could read my posts on BMA, and gleam much of the information they would want from a first interview(Do I make good marketing sense? Do I have good communication skills?). Either way, the employer saves time by either bumping me up to the front of the list, or removing me. It also saves my time, because I know if an employer reads my blog and then contacts me, it means that they are more likely to be interested in hiring me.
So far I have received one response:
Thanks Mack. I always like new ideas. I checked out the blog - and maybe I'm missing something - but I don't see information that shouts "hire me" about anyone, and as a previous Employment Manager/Recruiter, I would never have had the time to read this. I had about 10 seconds per resume. Am I missing something here? How could employers use this to find potential hires ?
Honestly, if the other writers had taken the time to respond, their response would have likely been very similar to this one. This reply screams to me 'I have never read a blog before'. Notice her response wasn't 'Mack I agree that blogs are a great way for employees to reach employers', or 'Mack I think blogs are growing, but I'm not sure they are yet to the point where they can be used as a successful tool in most job-seekers job search'. Anyone that is familiar with blogs, would already have an opinion, yay or nay, on using blogs as a recruiting tool.
I understand completely that recruiters only have a few seconds to scan a resume. I also framed the article proposal as a way for job-seekers to use their blog to appeal to employers. Anyone that's read a blog knows that you're not going to get anything from that blog during a 10-second visit.
But again, it looks like my appeal to 'old media' crapped out. However, earlier today, 2 geniune A-Listers, Hugh MacLeod and Tara Hunt, both linked to my quote on BMA:
"As you move down the long-tail, your marketing becomes less about the product, and more about the people." - Mack Collier
Tara also referred to it as a 'Brilliant quote'.
Now the key question is: Which referrals would have given BMA more valuable exposure, being featured in 5 articles from 5 members of 'old media', or 2 positive referrals from 2 of the most influential members of 'new media'?
I think it's....
New Media - 1
MSM - 0
posted by Mack Collier @ 7:32 PM,
- At 11:09 PM, J.D. said...
Just to be honest, I don't see any reason to hire any of the other bloggers beside yourself. What I'm seeing at BMA is random venting and complaining, and very little constructive marketing stuff.
From you, it's a different story. You actually try to come up with marketing solutions in your posts, and I always have liked that about you. The rest of them, however, barely turn anything in, and when they do, it's like .... and??? You had weeks to come up with something and THIS is it???
By the way, I don't think I'll be reading too much of True's stuff over there. I let him have an earful of it.
- At 11:46 PM, Mack Collier said...
I posted this on BMA, but I think if you read the post on AdPulp that True linked to, and then read True's post, it makes a bit more sense. Having said that, I think the post on AdPulp was the one that tried to stereotype MySpace users as being immature, and my guess is that True read the article and thought 'if this is how MySpace users act, then I can't relate'.
True's a good guy, my guess is that he isn't very familiar with MySpace, and just assumed that the girl that was quoted in the AdPulp post was your typical MySpace user. Might not have been the smartest move, but hell I've left some stupid posts myself, sometimes the only way to learn is to mess up.